tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post4074058165941425902..comments2024-03-15T20:18:01.139+07:00Comments on SlackBlogs: KDE 4.9 RC1 for Slackware-CurrentWilly Sudiarto Raharjohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12738382924950315620noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-68873095891578235882012-06-28T13:07:27.627+07:002012-06-28T13:07:27.627+07:00yeah , it is very very old :-) .
But, I just do a ...yeah , it is very very old :-) .<br />But, I just do a very normal browsing in workplace. So, I just let it. And I use chrome mostly.QuixoticSlackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00903349641696410115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-49682999105584406112012-06-28T12:11:56.473+07:002012-06-28T12:11:56.473+07:00Firefox 5? That's too old IMHO
I guess Chrome ...Firefox 5? That's too old IMHO<br />I guess Chrome 19 should be OK, since it's also a made by Google<br /><br />about company firewall, that's also a possibility but i guess to reply it's just a client side scripting (javascript)Willy Sudiarto Raharjohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12738382924950315620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-9084988791782738592012-06-28T12:09:10.000+07:002012-06-28T12:09:10.000+07:00I use chrome19.0 and FF5.0.1.
I am at work and the...I use chrome19.0 and FF5.0.1.<br />I am at work and the above are in my office system.<br />I also have doubt about the company firewall.<br />Bcoz, I can not view some pages in linuxquestions.org, which are all blocked by network admin.<br />:-)QuixoticSlackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00903349641696410115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-81750906222898881412012-06-28T12:01:13.384+07:002012-06-28T12:01:13.384+07:001. I think he is using plugins for WP
2. What brow...1. I think he is using plugins for WP<br />2. What browser do you use?Willy Sudiarto Raharjohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12738382924950315620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-19500233517945548192012-06-28T11:59:18.546+07:002012-06-28T11:59:18.546+07:00thats clear the doubts.
Thanks willy :-)
PS:
1....thats clear the doubts.<br /><br />Thanks willy :-)<br /><br />PS: <br />1. I really wonder how AlienBob is managing his blog against spammers without the image verification to post a comment.<br /><br />2. I can't able to do reply. Must be my browser issue. So I am adding as a New commentQuixoticSlackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00903349641696410115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-60706999925385187112012-06-28T11:49:57.467+07:002012-06-28T11:49:57.467+07:00No, you don't need attica 0.4.0 if you only wa...No, you don't need attica 0.4.0 if you only want to run KDE 4.9 Beta 2. If you want to stay sync with -Current, then the temporary solution is to have both version installed until KDE 4.9 RC1 gets released today<br /><br />If you remove attica-0.3 when using KDE 4.9 Beta 2, you will have a broken system since it's linked to attica-0.3Willy Sudiarto Raharjohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12738382924950315620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-47337156745412006332012-06-28T11:46:15.059+07:002012-06-28T11:46:15.059+07:00yeah got it.
But not fully.
What I understood is,
...yeah got it.<br />But not fully.<br />What I understood is,<br />1. though if we run KDE4.9 Beta 2 which built against attica 0.3.0 , we need both attica 0.3.0 and 0.4.0.<br />[since, you said, downgrade and Install next version ]<br /><br />So, why not remove attica 0.3.0, when we are using KDE4.9 Beta-2 itself? <br /><br />PS: I dont have more idea about atticaQuixotic_Slackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13071857853414088008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-42075420593886478462012-06-28T11:25:01.538+07:002012-06-28T11:25:01.538+07:00When Pat updated -current with KDE 4.8.4, he build...When Pat updated -current with KDE 4.8.4, he build it against attica 0.4.0. Unfortunately, KDE 4.9 Beta 2 was built against 0.3.0. <br />The solution for this problem is to downgrade to 0.3.0 first and then INSTALL 0.4.0 (not upgrade).<br />Slackpkg sees this condition as broken system, as there are 2 same package, but with different version.<br /><br />With KDE 4.9 RC1, all of the packages are now built against attica 0.4.0 and thus the problem should be gone by now and it's safe to remove attica-0.3 packageWilly Sudiarto Raharjohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12738382924950315620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7534848307469799413.post-80168945104940463012012-06-28T11:21:09.282+07:002012-06-28T11:21:09.282+07:00I didn't get it fully, about
" slackpkg w...I didn't get it fully, about<br />" slackpkg will not complaint anymore "<br /><br />means ?QuixoticSlackerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00903349641696410115noreply@blogger.com